Alright, sports fanatics in Nepal, let's talk 1xBet. You've probably seen the ads, heard the whispers, and maybe even considered jumping into the action. Is it worth it? Well, let's break it down, focusing on their mobile app – because let's be honest, who wants to be chained to a desktop these days?

The 1xBet app promises fast betting, live streaming, and those sweet, sweet instant withdrawals. Sounds tempting, right? They've been around since 2007, officially licensed, and claim to be 100% safe. They are supposed to be around until 2026 according to their license. But remember the fine print: 18+ only and gamble responsibly. That's non-negotiable.

Downloading and installing the app is pretty straightforward. Here's the deal:

  1. Download the APK file (that green button's your friend).
  2. Enable installation from "Unknown Sources" in your phone's security settings. It sounds scary, but it's necessary for apps not from the Google Play Store.
  3. Open the file and tap "Install". Boom. You're in.

What about the actual experience? The app boasts live broadcasts, instant notifications (goals, scores, promos!), and one-click betting. This is great if you want to bet quickly on live matches. But is the app any good?

Here's a quick https://1x-betnepal.com/en comparison to give you a better idea:

Feature 1xBet App
Live Streaming Quality (on average) 720p (most matches)
Withdrawal Speed (using e-wallets) Typically 1-3 hours
Welcome Bonus (as of Oct 26, 2024) 100% up to 13,000 NPR

Let's talk about those odds, too. They often advertise "high odds," and while that *can* be true, it's always smart to shop around and compare with other betting platforms. Don't just take their word for it! And remember, gambling should be fun, not a source of stress.

Customer support is supposedly 24/7, which is reassuring. Having quick access to help is always a plus.

So, should you download the 1xBet app? It depends. If you're looking for a convenient way to bet on sports, especially live, then it might be worth a shot. Just be smart, be responsible, and don't bet the farm on any one game. Gambling can be addictive, please remember that.

Performance of the Aktiia optical blood pressure measurement device in the elderly

Article authors Theiler, K., Sola, J., Damianaki, A., Pfister, A., Almeida, T. P., Alexandre, J., … Wuerzner, G.

Abstract

Background

Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is essential for the correct diagnosis and management of hypertension (HTN) especially in the elderly population. As with of all BP devices, the accuracy of cuffless devices must be verified. This study (NCT04027777) aimed to evaluate the performance of a wrist cuffless optical BP device in an elderly population cohort in different body positions with auscultation as the reference measurement.

Design and methods

Patients aged 65-85 years with different BP categories but without diabetes were recruited. After an initial calibration based on auscultatory measurements, BP estimation from the Aktiia Bracelet (Aktiia SA, Switzerland) were compared to reference double-blinded auscultatory measurements in sitting, standing and lying positions on four separate visits distributed over one month. In the absence of a universal standard for cuffless BP device at the time of the study, modified ISO81060-2 criteria were used for performance analysis.

Results

Thirty-five participants were included in the analysis fulfilling the inclusion requirements of ISO 81060-2. A total of 469 paired measurements were obtained with overall 83% acceptance rate. Differences (mean ± SD)  

between Aktiia Bracelet and auscultation for systolic BP were -0.26 ± 9.96 mmHg for all body positions aggregated (sitting 1.23 ± 7.88 mmHg, standing -1.81 ± 11.11 mmHg, lying -1.8 ± 9.96 mmHg). Similarly, differences for diastolic BP were -0.75 ± 7.0 mmHg (0.2 ± 5.55 mmHg, -5.35 ± 7.75 mmHg and -0.94 ± 7.47 mmHg, respectively). Standard deviation of the averaged differences per subject for systolic/diastolic BP was 3.8/2.5 mmHg in sitting and 4.4/3.7 mmHg for all body positions aggregated.

Conclusions

Overall, this study demonstrates a similar performance of the Aktiia Bracelet compared to auscultation in an elderly population in body positions representative of daily activities. The use of more comfortable, non-invasive, and non-occlusive BP monitors during long periods may facilitate e-health and may contribute to better management of HTN, including diagnosis and treatment of HTN, in the elderly.

Plain language summary

Accuracy of blood pressure measurements is essential in the diagnosis and the follow-up of patients with high blood pressure. As with any blood pressure measuring device, a validation is necessary. In this study including a elderly population, we compared values obtained by the cuffless Aktiia Bracelet (Aktiia SA, Switzerland) after an initial calibration with the reference auscultatory method during four separate study days distributed over one month. We show that the accuracy of the Aktiia Bracelet is similar to auscultation. The accuracy varies depending on the position in which the measurement is performed. Overall, the accuracy is not modified by a higher age category. The use of a cuffless device in the elderly population characterized by high prevalence of hypertension may facilitate the follow-up of blood pressure with more comfort and minimal constraints.